SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. William D. Pierson

Last decided Fort WayneJul 2026
Decisions 4,404since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rates for William D. Pierson are calculated based on 4,404 decisions on record since 2016. When evaluating these figures, it is helpful to compare the judge's performance against the 45% to 68% approval range seen among other judges whose most recent office on record is Fort Wayne. Latest-period data shows the judge's approval rate at 60%, which aligns with the local office average.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 57%
Decisions on record 4,404
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Pierson Fort Wayne National
Approval rate 60% 60% 58%
Fully favorable 49% — —
Denials 40% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Pierson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Pierson
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, your approval rate for William D. Pierson has shown fluctuations. After a period of lower approval rates in 2017 and 2018, the judge saw a rise in 2020 and 2023, followed by more recent stabilization. The latest-period approval rate of 60% indicates a steady pattern compared to the overall average on record. This trend suggests that while outcomes vary year to year, recent decisions remain consistent with broader office benchmarks.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Pierson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Fort Wayne hearing office

William D. Pierson's most recent office on record is the Fort Wayne hearing office. This office is part of a regional network that manages disability claims. With a bench of 4 judges, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 60%. You can see the Fort Wayne Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Fort Wayne

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 4 judges whose most recent office on record is the Fort Wayne office. Approval rates across this bench range from 45% to 68% since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions