SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. L. D. Pischek

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Mobile Hearing Office · 3 years on the bench · 6,381 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Pischek?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's history to broader benchmarks provides context for what to expect during your hearing. Judge Pischek's lifetime approval rate of 29% is measured against the Mobile Hearing Office latest rate of 73% and the national average of 58%. These figures are derived from a docket of 6,381 lifetime decisions, offering a stable view of past judicial activity. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Pischek Mobile National
Approval rate 29% 73% 58%
Fully favorable 25%
Denials 71%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Pischek's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Pischek
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY18
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a three-year tenure, your judge's approval rate moved from 39% in 2016 to 22% in 2018. This pattern reflects the judge's approach to the 6,381 lifetime decisions handled during their time on the bench. While yearly fluctuations are common in Social Security Disability Insurance hearings, the data indicates a consistent approach to how evidence is weighed. You can find more information on the Mobile Hearing Office page.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Pischek's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Pischek? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Mobile hearing office

The Mobile Hearing Office serves a wide population across Alabama, managing a high volume of SSDI cases. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains a latest approval rate of 73%, which is higher than the national average. You can expect a formal environment focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file. You can see the Mobile Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning you cannot choose your judge. At the Mobile Hearing Office, the bench consists of 6 judges with lifetime approval rates ranging from 29% to 76%. Because of this variance, the specific judge assigned to your case can influence your hearing experience. You can find more information on the Mobile Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions