SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Maria E. Quant

Last decided San JuanJul 2026
Decisions 986since 2023

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure accuracy. The 72% approval rate on record since February 2023 provides a stable baseline derived from 986 decisions. When looking at the latest reporting period, the 70% approval rate sits 2 points below the San Juan office average of 72%. These figures reflect past decisions rather than predictions for your specific hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2023
Approval rate 72%
Decisions on record 986
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Quant San Juan National
Approval rate 70% 72% 58%
Fully favorable 53% — —
Denials 30% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Quant's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Quant
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY23FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Maria E. Quant has shifted since February 2023. Starting with an 82% approval rate in 2023, the data shows 75% in 2024, 70% in 2025, and 70% in the most recent partial fiscal year. With 986 total decisions on record, this pattern reflects a consistent volume of activity. The latest period aligns with the recent trend, suggesting a stabilization in the decision-making pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Quant's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Juan hearing office

Maria E. Quant's most recent office on record is the San Juan hearing office, which serves you across Puerto Rico. This office maintains a bench of 11 judges who handle a high volume of disability claims. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 72%, reflecting the local administrative environment.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is San Juan

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 11 judges whose most recent office on record is the San Juan hearing office, with 7 of them having decided cases in the latest SSA file. Approval rates for this bench range from 62% to 88% on their records. Preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions