SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Maria E. Quant

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2023
Decisions 986 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at consistent timeframes. While Maria E. Quant maintains a 72% lifetime approval rate, her latest-period data shows a 70% approval rate, which is 2 percentage points below the San Juan office average of 72%. These figures are drawn from 986 lifetime decisions, providing a stable statistical foundation. These rates reflect historical trends rather than specific outcomes for your case.

Lifetime SSA records since 2023
Approval rate 72%
Decisions on record 986
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Quant San Juan National
Approval rate 70% 72% 58%
Fully favorable 53%
Denials 30%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Quant's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Quant
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY23FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2023, the approval trend for Maria E. Quant has shifted from an 82% rate in her initial reporting period to a steady 70% in the most recent data. This pattern reflects a total of 986 decisions on record. While the latest-period denial rate stands at 30%, the volume of cases suggests a consistent approach to evaluating evidence. The recent stability in her approval rate indicates a settled pattern in how she processes disability claims.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Quant's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Juan hearing office

The San Juan hearing office serves claimants throughout Puerto Rico. As one of 11 judges on record at this location, Maria E. Quant contributes to a diverse bench with an office-wide lifetime approval range of 62% to 88%. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the San Juan Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The San Juan hearing office utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment is essentially random. Across the 11 judges on record at this office since 2016, lifetime approval rates vary significantly, ranging from 62% to 88%. With 7 judges currently reporting in the latest SSA data, you may be assigned to any member of this bench. The guidance for your hearing remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions