SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Michael D. Quayle

Last decided MinneapolisSep 2016
Decisions 445since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

When evaluating your hearing, it is helpful to look at how a judge's approval rate compares to their peers. The 14 judges whose most recent office on record is Minneapolis show a range of approval rates from 33% to 68% on their records since 2016. This variation highlights why the specific judge assigned to your case matters. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 58%
Decisions on record 445

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Quayle. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2016. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Quayle's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Quayle
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Michael D. Quayle is based on 445 decisions on record since 2016. During 2016, the judge maintained an approval rate of 58%. This pattern provides a view of the judge's past activity within the SSA system. Understanding these trends can help you and your representative prepare for the evidence and testimony required for your hearing.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Quayle's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Minneapolis hearing office

The Minneapolis hearing office serves you across Minnesota and the surrounding region. There are 14 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, which maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 52%. You can expect a formal hearing process where the quality of medical evidence is the primary factor in the outcome. You can see the Minneapolis Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Minneapolis

The SSA assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 14 judges whose most recent office on record is Minneapolis, and their approval rates vary significantly across the bench. With a range of 33% to 68% among these peers, your assigned judge can influence the context of your hearing. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions