SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Michael D. Quayle

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Minneapolis Hearing Office · 1 years on the bench · 2,871 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Quayle?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's history against broader benchmarks provides context for your upcoming hearing. Judge Quayle's 58% lifetime approval rate is measured against the Minneapolis office's latest 54% rate and the national average of 58%. These figures are derived from a docket of 2,871 lifetime decisions, offering a clear view of past trends. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Quayle Minneapolis National
Approval rate 58% 54% 58%
Fully favorable 49%
Denials 42%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Quayle's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Quayle
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over 1 year on the bench, Judge Quayle has presided over 2,871 lifetime decisions. The data shows a steady approval trend, with performance remaining consistent throughout the judge's tenure. Recent reporting indicates the approval rate is currently tracking 4 points higher than the local office average. This stability suggests a predictable approach to case evaluation, though every hearing depends on the specific medical evidence you present.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Quayle's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Quayle? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Minneapolis hearing office

The Minneapolis Hearing Office serves you throughout Minnesota, managing a high volume of disability cases. With 6 judges on the bench, the office maintains an office-wide latest approval rate of 54%. You can expect a professional environment where the focus remains on your medical documentation and vocational testimony. See the Minneapolis Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Across the Minneapolis bench, lifetime approval rates for judges range from 47% to 67%. While these rates vary, the fundamental requirements for proving disability remain consistent regardless of the presiding judge. You can find more information on the Minneapolis Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions