Steven M. Rachal's most recent office on record is the Alexandria hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. Across the 3,409 decisions on record since June 2017, 33% have been approved. Judges whose most recent office on record is this one range from 26% to 67% on their records, and case assignment is random, so the judge you draw matters. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings. An attorney can help you prepare for your hearing.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
The approval rate for Steven M. Rachal is based on 3,409 decisions on record since 2017. When comparing this to the bench at the Alexandria hearing office, where judges range from 26% to 67% approval, it is helpful to look at both the long-term record and the most recent reporting period. In the latest period, the judge's 36% approval rate sits 19 points below the office rate of 55%.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Rachal's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
The approval rate for Steven M. Rachal has shown variation since 2017. After an initial period of higher approvals, the rate stabilized before seeing a more recent shift in the 2024 and 2025 fiscal years. The latest reporting period shows a 36% approval rate, which reflects a continuation of the patterns observed in recent years. These fluctuations often correlate with changes in the specific mix of medical evidence presented in cases.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Rachal's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Alexandria hearing office
The Alexandria hearing office serves you across Louisiana and the surrounding region. As the most recent office on record for Steven M. Rachal as of July 2026, it maintains a bench of 10 judges with varying approval patterns. The office-wide approval rate in the latest reporting period was 55%, providing a baseline for the local hearing environment.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Alexandria
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is the Alexandria hearing office, and 7 of them decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 26% to 67% on their records since 2016.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Steven M. Rachal has a 33% approval rate on record since 2017. This sits within the range of 26% to 67% seen among the 10 judges whose most recent office on record is the Alexandria hearing office. An attorney can help you understand how to prepare your evidence for this specific bench.
Yes, the approval rate for Steven M. Rachal has fluctuated over the 3,409 decisions on record since June 2017. While the rate was higher in 2017, it has since moved through different levels, reaching 36% in the most recent reporting period. An attorney can help you evaluate how these trends might impact your case strategy.
No, you cannot request a specific judge. The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm to ensure efficiency. Because assignment is random, it is important to be prepared for any judge by working with an attorney who understands the hearing process.
An SSDI hearing is a formal but non-adversarial proceeding where a judge reviews your medical evidence and testimony. You will likely answer questions about your work history and limitations from the judge and potentially a vocational expert. An attorney can help you organize your medical records and prepare your testimony to ensure your case is presented clearly.
An approval rate is a statistical summary of past decisions and does not predict the outcome of your specific hearing. While Steven M. Rachal's 33% rate on record since 2017 provides context, the strength of your medical evidence remains the most critical factor. An attorney can help you identify the specific evidence needed to build a strong case for your disability claim.




