SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Sommattie Ramrup

Last decided New York VarickSep 2025
Decisions 1,364since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. The 63% approval rate for Sommattie Ramrup reflects a long-term record since 2016, which can be measured against the 48% to 85% range seen among other judges whose most recent office on record is the New York Varick hearing office. These figures provide a statistical baseline for your hearing, though they do not predict the outcome of your specific case.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 63%
Decisions on record 1,364

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Ramrup. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Ramrup's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Ramrup
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Sommattie Ramrup has shown variation across the 1,364 decisions on record since 2016. While the rate fluctuated during the middle years of this window, the trend has shifted in more recent periods. These shifts often reflect changes in the complexity of cases or the specific evidence presented in individual hearings. Understanding this pattern helps you prepare for the hearing process, as the latest period reflects a departure from earlier averages.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Ramrup's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the New York Varick hearing office

Sommattie Ramrup's most recent office on record is the New York Varick hearing office, with decisions there through September 2025. This office serves the local region and maintains a bench of 10 judges whose most recent records are tied to this location. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on the medical and vocational evidence of your claim.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is New York Varick

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is the New York Varick hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 48% to 85% on their since-2016 records. Because individual judges have different approaches to evidence, the specific judge assigned to your case matters. For preparation purposes, the guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions