SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Mark C. Ramsey

Last decided SacramentoSep 2016
Decisions 413since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. The 39% approval rate for Mark C. Ramsey reflects all decisions on record since 2016, which can be measured against the 39% to 80% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is Sacramento. These figures are based on 413 decisions on record, providing a view of past activity. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 39%
Decisions on record 413

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Ramsey. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2016. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Ramsey's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Ramsey
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Mark C. Ramsey stands at 39% based on 413 decisions on record since 2016. The data window for this judge spans from January 2016 to September 2016. Because this record covers a specific, limited timeframe, the pattern reflects the outcomes from that period. These historical figures provide a baseline for understanding how cases were handled during that time.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Ramsey's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Sacramento hearing office

Mark C. Ramsey's most recent office on record is the Sacramento hearing office, with decisions there through September 2016. This office serves you if you are in the Sacramento area. With 20 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, it handles a significant volume of disability claims.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Sacramento

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 20 judges whose most recent office on record is the Sacramento hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 39% to 80% on their since-2016 records. While these rates vary, the process for presenting evidence remains consistent across the bench.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions