SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Sally C. Reason

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 3,290 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing performance requires looking at consistent timeframes. Judge Reason's lifetime approval rate of 43% sits within the 40% to 67% range observed across the Los Angeles West bench. In the most recent reporting period, her 42% approval rate is 20 percentage points lower than the office-wide latest-period average of 62%. These aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting your specific outcome.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 43%
Decisions on record 3,290
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Reason Los Angeles West National
Approval rate 42% 62% 58%
Fully favorable 38%
Denials 58%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Reason's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Reason
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Judge Reason has maintained a consistent volume of cases, with 3,290 lifetime decisions on record. Her yearly approval trends show fluctuations, moving from 52% in 2016 to 42% in 2026. This pattern reflects a steady approach to evidence evaluation over the last decade. The latest period shows a denial rate of 58%.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Reason's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Los Angeles West hearing office

The Los Angeles West hearing office serves claimants throughout the California region. With 9 judges on record, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 62%. You can expect a standard administrative hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can find the full ALJ roster on the Los Angeles West Hearing Office page.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 9 judges on record at this office since 2016, 5 of whom reported in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 40% to 67% on a lifetime basis. Your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions