SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Lillian Richter

Last decided AlbuquerqueSep 2022
Decisions 2,167since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The 46% approval rate for Lillian Richter covers all 2,167 decisions on record since 2016. This sits within the 41% to 89% range observed among the 14 judges whose most recent office on record is the Albuquerque hearing office. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 46%
Decisions on record 2,167

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Richter. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2022. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Richter's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Richter
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY22
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Lillian Richter shows a varied trend across the 2,167 decisions on record since 2016. After maintaining an approval rate between 46% and 53% through 2019, the data shows a decline in the following years, reaching 32% in 2022. This pattern reflects historical decision-making over the recorded window.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Richter's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Albuquerque hearing office

Lillian Richter's most recent office on record is the Albuquerque hearing office, which serves you across New Mexico. With 14 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, you can expect a standard hearing process focused on medical documentation and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Albuquerque

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 14 judges whose most recent office on record is the Albuquerque hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 41% to 89% on their since-2016 records. Because every judge has a unique approach to evaluating evidence, understanding the office-wide bench is helpful.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions