SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Robert Rideout

Last decided RaleighJul 2026
Decisions 2,104since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing Robert Rideout's performance requires looking at both long-term records and recent trends. Since 2016, the judge has maintained a 71% approval rate, which sits within the 27% to 74% range seen across the Raleigh bench. In the most recent reporting period, the judge's 71% approval rate outperformed the office average of 61% by 10 percentage points. These figures are based on 2,104 decisions on record since 2016.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 71%
Decisions on record 2,104
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Rideout Raleigh National
Approval rate 71% 61% 58%
Fully favorable 69% — —
Denials 29% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Rideout's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Rideout
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Robert Rideout has shown variability since 2016, with a peak in 2023 at 83% before trending toward 70% in the most recent partial fiscal year. With 2,104 total decisions on record, the judge's pattern suggests a consistent approach to evaluating evidence. The latest period's 71% approval rate aligns closely with the long-term average, suggesting a stable decision-making process.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Rideout's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Raleigh hearing office

The Raleigh hearing office serves you across North Carolina and is part of a regional network of SSA facilities. This office hosts a bench of 17 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 61%, you can expect a rigorous review of your medical and vocational evidence.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Raleigh

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the Raleigh hearing office, 10 of whom decided cases in the latest SSA file from July 2026. Approval rates for this bench range from 27% to 74% since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions