SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jack Russak

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Jersey City Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 20,651 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Russak?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at both lifetime averages and recent trends. Judge Russak has a 60% lifetime approval rate, which provides a stable baseline derived from 20,651 decisions. In the most recent reporting period, your approval rate was 57%, which sits 5 points below the Jersey City Hearing Office average of 65%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Metric Judge Russak Jersey City National
Approval rate 60% 65% 58%
Fully favorable 46%
Denials 43%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Russak's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Russak
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a decade on the bench, Judge Russak has seen approval rates fluctuate within a consistent range. Starting at 53% in 2016, the rate trended upward to a peak of 66% in 2023 before adjusting to 55% in the most recent 2025 data. This pattern suggests a judge who responds to shifts in case complexity and evidence standards over time. The recent period reflects a continuation of this steady, long-term pattern of decision-making.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Russak's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Russak? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Jersey City hearing office

The Jersey City Hearing Office serves a large population across New Jersey, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an active docket and a latest approval rate of 65%. You can expect a rigorous review process focused on medical documentation and vocational evidence. You can see the Jersey City Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Judge Russak is essentially random. Across the Jersey City bench, lifetime approval rates for judges range from 47% to 81%. This wide variance highlights why legal preparation is essential regardless of which judge is assigned to your hearing. You can view the full roster of judges on the Jersey City Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions