SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Sheena Barr

On record 3,091 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing judicial records requires looking at consistent timeframes. While Sheena Barr holds a 78% lifetime approval rate, her latest-period performance shows an 80% approval rate, which sits 15 points above the Jersey City office average of 65%. These figures are drawn from a robust set of 3,091 lifetime decisions, providing a clear view of her historical decision-making. These aggregate rates reflect past trends rather than specific outcomes for your hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 78%
Decisions on record 3,091
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Barr Jersey City National
Approval rate 80% 65% 58%
Fully favorable 76%
Denials 20%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Barr's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Barr
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Sheena Barr has maintained a generally upward trend in her approval rates. While her early record saw rates in the low 70s, recent years have shown a marked increase, peaking at 90% in 2024 and 2025 before settling at 80% in the most recent reporting period. This pattern suggests a steady approach to evaluating evidence over her 3,091 lifetime decisions. The latest period reflects a continuation of this pattern, remaining well above the office-wide average.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Barr's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Jersey City hearing office

The Jersey City hearing office serves you and other claimants throughout the region, managing a diverse caseload of disability applications. With 11 judges on record, the office maintains an office-wide latest approval rate of 65%. You can expect a formal hearing process where evidence quality is the primary factor in your outcome. You can see the Jersey City Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning you cannot request a specific judge. There are 11 judges on record at this office since 2016, 10 of whom reported in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 44% to 79% on a lifetime basis. Your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions