SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Sheena Barr

Last decided Jersey CityJul 2026
Decisions 3,091since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates provides context for how a judge's decisions align with broader trends. Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, the 81% approval rate for Judge Barr sits above the 65% office average, 63% state average, and 58% national average.

Last 12 months July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Barr Jersey City National
Approval rate 81% 65% 58%
Fully favorable 76% — —
Denials 19% — —
Decisions 348 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 78%
Decisions on record 3,091

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Barr's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Barr
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Judge Barr has issued 3,091 decisions. The annual approval rate has varied over this period, reaching 90% in 2024 and 2025 before shifting to 80% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. While the 12-month approval rate of 81% remains high, it sits slightly above the 78% record since 2016.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Barr's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Jersey City hearing office

The Jersey City hearing office serves the surrounding region of New Jersey. As of the most recent data through July 2026, the office bench consists of 11 judges, 10 of whom are represented in the latest SSA file.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Jersey City

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. The 10 judges who decided cases here in SSA's latest file range from 40% to 81% on their 12-month approval rates.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Barr's 81%. Four of them last decided cases in New Jersey. With too few close matches there, the rest come from SSA's New York region.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Barr and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions