SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Julie Sammer

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Minneapolis Hearing Office · 3 years on the bench · 5,692 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Sammer?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Sammer maintains a lifetime approval rate of 63%, which provides a significant baseline when compared to the Minneapolis Hearing Office latest approval rate of 54%. During the most recent reporting period, her 57% approval rate remained 3 points lower than the national average of 58%. With 5,692 lifetime decisions, the data offers a stable look at her judicial history. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Sammer Minneapolis National
Approval rate 63% 54% 58%
Fully favorable 51%
Denials 43%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Sammer's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Sammer
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY23FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over her 3 years on the bench, Judge Sammer has presided over 5,692 lifetime decisions. Her yearly approval trend shows a shift, moving from 68% in 2023 to 64% in 2024, and 59% in 2025. This trend reflects a change in the cases assigned to her docket. The latest period reflects a continuation of this pattern as she aligns more closely with the broader office environment.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Sammer's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Sammer? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Minneapolis hearing office

The Minneapolis Hearing Office serves a broad population across Minnesota, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an average approval rate of 54% as of the latest reporting period. You can expect a review process that prioritizes your medical documentation and vocational testimony. See the Minneapolis Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases to judges using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning you cannot choose your judge. Within the Minneapolis Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 47% to 67%. This variance highlights why understanding the local bench is useful, even though your specific assignment is random. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions