SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. James Satterwhite

Last decided NHC St LouisSep 2019
Decisions 410since 2017

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Understanding how your judge compares to their peers provides helpful context for your upcoming hearing. The 44% approval rate for James Satterwhite is based on 410 decisions on record since December 2017. This figure sits within the 40% to 79% range observed among the 15 judges whose most recent office on record is the NHC St Louis.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2017
Approval rate 44%
Decisions on record 410

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Satterwhite. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2019. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Judge Satterwhite isn't in SSA's latest disposition file, so the judge comparison tool, which compares active judges over one period, leaves them out.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Satterwhite's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Satterwhite
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY18FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

James Satterwhite decided 410 cases between December 2017 and September 2019. His approval rate showed a slight upward trend, moving from 43% in 2018 to 45% in 2019. This steady pattern suggests a consistent approach to evaluating evidence over the period recorded.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Satterwhite's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the NHC St Louis hearing office

The NHC St Louis serves claimants in Missouri and the surrounding region. This office has a bench of 15 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on the specific medical documentation provided for your claim.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is NHC St Louis

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 15 judges whose most recent office on record is the NHC St Louis, with approval rates ranging from 40% to 79%. Because you cannot choose your judge, it is important to focus on the strength of your medical evidence.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions