SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. John Martin

On record 3,717 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rates for John Martin reflect his history of decision-making at the Evanston office. When comparing his latest-period approval rate of 64% against the office-wide latest-period rate of 61%, he sits 3 percentage points higher. These figures are supported by a docket of 3,717 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 63%
Decisions on record 3,717
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Martin Evanston National
Approval rate 64% 61% 58%
Fully favorable 53%
Denials 36%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Martin's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Martin
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval pattern for John Martin has varied, moving from 79% in 2016 to a more recent steady range. His latest-period approval rate of 64% remains consistent with his lifetime average of 63%. This trend suggests a stable approach to case evaluation over the last decade.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Martin's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Evanston hearing office

The Evanston hearing office serves the Illinois region, handling a high volume of disability claims with a bench of 16 judges on record. The office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 61%. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the Evanston Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 16 judges on record at this office since 2016, 7 of whom reported in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 45% to 79% on a lifetime basis.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions