SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Roxanne Fuller

Last decided NHC ChicagoJul 2026
Decisions 3,539since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, Roxanne Fuller's 61% approval rate is measured against the NHC Chicago office rate of 54%, the state rate of 54%, and the national rate of 58%. These figures are based on 114 decisions. Comparing these rates provides context on how recent activity aligns with broader office and national trends.

Last 12 months July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Fuller NHC Chicago National
Approval rate 61% 54% 58%
Fully favorable 58% — —
Denials 39% — —
Decisions 114 — —
All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 51%
Decisions on record 3,539

SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Fuller's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Fuller
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since January 2016, Roxanne Fuller has issued 3,539 decisions. The approval rate has fluctuated over this period, moving from 51% in 2016 to 62% in 2026. The most recent 12 months to July 31, 2026, show a 61% approval rate, which sits above the 51% approval rate recorded across the entire period since 2016.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Fuller's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the NHC Chicago hearing office

NHC Chicago is the most recent office on record for Roxanne Fuller, with activity documented through July 2026. This office serves you and other claimants in the region, with 19 judges on record as having this as their most recent office. The office maintained a 54% approval rate over the 12 months to July 31, 2026.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is NHC Chicago

The Social Security Administration assigns cases randomly. Among the 9 judges who decided cases at NHC Chicago in SSA's latest file, approval rates range from 17% to 88% over the 12 months to July 31, 2026. There are 19 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 9 of them having decided cases here in SSA's latest file.

Judges with similar approval rates

These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Fuller's 61%. All five last decided cases in Illinois.

Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Fuller and the three closest side by side →

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions