SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Michael Schaefer

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Madison Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 22,853 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Schaefer?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Schaefer has maintained a 62% lifetime approval rate over a decade of service. Compared to the most recent reporting period, his 70% approval rate stands 4 points above both the state and national averages of 58%. These figures are derived from a docket of 22,853 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Schaefer Madison National
Approval rate 62% 69% 58%
Fully favorable 60%
Denials 30%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Schaefer's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Schaefer
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over 10 years on the bench, your judge's approval rates have ranged from a low of 51% in 2021 to a high of 73% in 2017. The data shows a recent upward trend, with the most recent period reaching 70% approval. This shift reflects a move toward higher allowance rates compared to the dip seen between 2020 and 2021. The latest period continues this recent pattern.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Schaefer's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Schaefer? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Madison hearing office

The Madison Hearing Office serves you and other claimants across Wisconsin and parts of the surrounding region. It is staffed by a team of judges who manage a high volume of disability claims, with an office-wide latest approval rate of 69%. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on your medical documentation and vocational testimony. Visit the Madison (Wisconsin) Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment is essentially random. Within the Madison Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 49% to 78%. Because you cannot choose your judge, your focus should remain on the strength of your medical evidence.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions