Mark Schafer's most recent office on record is the Little Rock Hearing Office, with decisions there through July 2026. Across the 4,405 decisions on record since January 2016, 35% have been approved. Judges whose most recent office on record is this one range from 27% to 66% on their since-2016 records. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for this judge's specific bench.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. Mark Schafer's 35% approval rate on record since 2016 sits within the 27% to 66% range of the Little Rock bench. In the most recent reporting period, the 35% approval rate compares to a 43% office average, a 47% state average, and a 58% national average. These figures are based on 4,405 decisions on record, providing a stable sample size. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Schafer's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Since January 2016, Mark Schafer has issued 4,405 decisions. The yearly approval trend shows fluctuation, with rates moving from 39% in 2016 to 35% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. The rate has remained consistent over the last several years, with the latest period reflecting a 35% approval rate.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Schafer's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Little Rock hearing office
Mark Schafer's most recent office on record is the Little Rock Hearing Office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves the state of Arkansas. The bench consists of 16 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 43%. You can expect a standardized hearing process at this location.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Little Rock
The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 16 judges whose most recent office on record is the Little Rock office, and 8 of them decided cases here in SSA's latest file through July 2026. Approval rates for this bench range from 27% to 66% since 2016. Your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Mark Schafer has a 35% approval rate on record since 2016. This falls within the 27% to 66% range of the 16 judges whose most recent office on record is the Little Rock Hearing Office. An attorney can help you understand how to tailor your evidence for this specific bench.
Mark Schafer's approval rate has seen fluctuations since 2016, starting at 39% and currently sitting at 35% for the partial 2026 fiscal year. While the rate has held steady, your case outcome depends heavily on the specific medical evidence you present. A free case review can help you determine if your documentation meets the necessary criteria. An attorney can help you prepare your case.
No, you cannot request a specific judge. The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, making the assignment process random. Regardless of the judge, an attorney can help you prepare your case for the hearing.
An SSDI hearing is a formal but non-adversarial proceeding where a judge reviews your medical records and hears your testimony. You may be asked about your daily limitations and work history. Having an attorney can help you prepare for the questions you will face during the hearing.
A judge's approval rate is a reflection of past decisions and not a prediction for your specific hearing. Your outcome is primarily determined by the quality of your medical evidence and how well it proves your disability under SSA rules. An attorney can help you ensure your evidence is as strong as possible.




