SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Kimberly D. Schulz

Last decided BronxJul 2026
Decisions 718since 2023

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure accuracy. While the office bench shows a wide range of outcomes from 43% to 84% on record, recent data provides a more focused view of current trends. In the latest reporting period, Kimberly D. Schulz maintained a 60% approval rate, which is 5 percentage points higher than the Bronx office average of 55%. These figures reflect past performance and do not indicate how your specific case will be decided.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2023
Approval rate 57%
Decisions on record 718
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Schulz Bronx National
Approval rate 60% 55% 58%
Fully favorable 51% — —
Denials 40% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Schulz's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Schulz
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY24FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since November 2023, Kimberly D. Schulz has issued 718 decisions. The yearly trend shows a consistent volume of cases, with approval rates moving from 55% in 2024 to 54% in 2025, followed by a rise to 60% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. This recent shift reflects a change in the approval pattern compared to the earlier record, which may be influenced by the specific evidence presented in your recent hearings.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Schulz's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Bronx hearing office

The Bronx hearing office serves you throughout the region, maintaining a bench of 16 judges on record. In the latest reporting period, the office-wide approval rate was 55%. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on the medical and vocational evidence of your claim. You can see the Bronx Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Bronx

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 16 judges whose most recent office on record is the Bronx, and 6 of them decided cases here in the latest file ending July 2026. Because approval rates across this bench vary significantly from 43% to 84%, understanding the local context is helpful. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions