SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Joseph T. Scruton

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 4,227 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure accuracy. Joseph T. Scruton has a lifetime approval rate of 66%, which sits at the top of the 41% to 66% range observed among all judges at the Roanoke office. In the most recent reporting period, his 70% approval rate outperformed the office-wide rate of 54% by 16 percentage points. These figures reflect past decisions rather than predictions for your hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 66%
Decisions on record 4,227
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Scruton Roanoke National
Approval rate 70% 54% 58%
Fully favorable 57%
Denials 30%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Scruton's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Scruton
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the record for Joseph T. Scruton shows a steady pattern of approvals. After starting at 58% in 2016, his annual approval rate has fluctuated but generally trended upward, reaching 70% in the most recent reporting period. This latest figure aligns closely with his long-term average, suggesting a stable approach to case evaluation.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Scruton's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Roanoke hearing office

The Roanoke hearing office serves you throughout Virginia and the surrounding region. It is staffed by 5 judges on record who manage a high volume of disability claims. The office currently reports a latest-period approval rate of 54%, reflecting the local environment for benefit determinations. You can see the Roanoke hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 5 judges on record at this office since 2016, 4 of whom reported in the latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 41% to 66% on a lifetime basis. You can find more information on the Roanoke hearing office page.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions