SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Robert M. Senander

Last decided Oak BrookSep 2017
Decisions 835since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's performance requires looking at the since-2016 record to ensure you are measuring against the same timeframe. While the office bench shows a wide range of approval rates from 35% to 84%, your outcome depends on the specific medical evidence you present. With 835 decisions on record, the data provides a clear view of past trends.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 60%
Decisions on record 835

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Senander. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 29, 2017. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Senander's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Senander
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY17
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Robert M. Senander moved from 62% in 2016 to 58% in 2017. This data covers 835 total decisions on record starting in January 2016. Because the record window closed in September 2017, these figures represent a specific historical period. This pattern reflects the judge's consistent approach to evaluating disability claims during that time.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Senander's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Oak Brook hearing office

Robert M. Senander's most recent office on record is the Oak Brook hearing office, with decisions there through September 2017. This office serves the Illinois region and maintains a bench of 10 judges. You should be prepared for a thorough review of your medical documentation and work history at this office.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Oak Brook

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with approval rates ranging from 35% to 84%. Because each judge has a unique approach to evaluating evidence, understanding the broader bench helps you prepare for your hearing.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions