SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Edward P. Studzinski

On record 4,649 decisions since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rates for Edward P. Studzinski are based on 4,649 lifetime decisions recorded since 2016. When evaluating these numbers, it is helpful to compare his lifetime record against the 35% to 84% approval range seen among other judges at the Oak Brook office. While latest-period data shows a 45% approval rate, aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than individual hearing outcomes.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 35%
Decisions on record 4,649
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Studzinski Oak Brook National
Approval rate 45% 60% 58%
Fully favorable 37%
Denials 55%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Studzinski's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Studzinski
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the decision pattern for Edward P. Studzinski has shown variation. After several years of lower approval rates, the data indicates a recent upward trend, with the latest period reaching 45% approval. This shift suggests that the judge's recent approach differs from his historical average, though the specific evidence in your file remains the primary factor in your final determination.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Studzinski's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Oak Brook hearing office

The Oak Brook hearing office serves claimants throughout the Illinois region. With a bench of 10 judges on record, this office manages a high volume of disability claims. The office-wide latest approval rate is 60%, providing a benchmark for the local administrative environment.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you draw is essentially random. There are 10 judges on record at the Oak Brook office since 2016, with 2 judges currently reported in the latest SSA file. Approval rates across this bench vary widely, ranging from 35% to 84% over their respective careers.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions