SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Edward P. Studzinski

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Oak Brook Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 27,061 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Studzinski?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's lifetime performance to current office and national trends provides context for your upcoming hearing. While the national average approval rate currently sits at 58%, Judge Studzinski's recent reporting period shows a 39% approval rate. These figures are derived from a significant volume of 27,061 lifetime decisions, offering a stable look at historical trends. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Metric Judge Studzinski Oak Brook National
Approval rate 34% 57% 58%
Fully favorable 30%
Denials 61%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Studzinski's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Studzinski
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over his 10 years on the bench, Judge Studzinski has maintained a consistent decision pattern. His approval rates have fluctuated, starting at 42% in 2016 and reaching 36% in 2025. The latest reporting period shows a variance from his lifetime average of 34%, which is common in administrative law as case mixes evolve. This pattern reflects a stable, long-term approach to evaluating disability claims.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Studzinski's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Studzinski? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Oak Brook hearing office

The Oak Brook Hearing Office serves you and other claimants across Illinois and the surrounding region. With a bench of 6 judges, the office manages a high volume of cases to ensure timely access to hearings. The office currently maintains an approval rate of 57%, which serves as a benchmark for the local area.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Across the Oak Brook Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 34% to 83%. Because of this variance, it is important to focus on the strength of your medical evidence regardless of which judge is assigned to your hearing.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions