Edward P. Studzinski's most recent office on record is the Oak Brook Hearing Office, with decisions there through July 2026. Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, 45% of his 486 decisions were approvals, compared to 61% at the office over the same window. On record since 2016, 35% of his 4,649 decisions were approvals. An attorney can help you prepare your case for your hearing.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe. Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, Edward P. Studzinski's 45% approval rate sits against an office average of 61%, a state average of 54%, and a national average of 58%. These figures are drawn from the decisions issued during that period.
SSA publishes no office- or national-level breakdown of fully favorable and denial rates. The 12 months are SSA's figures for this fiscal year to date plus the rest of the previous fiscal year; how we calculate them.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Studzinski's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Since 2016, Edward P. Studzinski has issued 4,649 decisions. His annual approval rates have fluctuated, reaching a low of 29% in 2023 before trending to 45% over the 12 months to July 31, 2026. This recent rate is higher than his 35% approval rate across the entire record since 2016.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Studzinski's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Oak Brook hearing office
The Oak Brook Hearing Office is the most recent office on record for Edward P. Studzinski as of July 2026. Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, the office maintained an approval rate of 61%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Oak Brook
The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your judge is assigned randomly. Within the Oak Brook Hearing Office, the 2 judges who decided cases here in SSA's latest file range from 45% to 81% in their approval rates over the 12 months to July 31, 2026.
Judges with similar approval rates
These active judges' approval rates over the same 12 months (July 26, 2025 – July 31, 2026) are closest to Judge Studzinski's 45%. All five last decided cases in Illinois.
- 46% Approval rate, last 12 months Karen Sayon
- 43% Approval rate, last 12 months Jessica Inouye
- 47% Approval rate, last 12 months Shreese M. Wilson
- 48% Approval rate, last 12 months Margaret A. Carey
- 41% Approval rate, last 12 months Jordan Garelick
Rates within 5 points of each other are hard to tell apart at a typical caseload, so treat these as judges with comparable records, not a ranking. See Judge Studzinski and the three closest side by side →
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, Edward P. Studzinski's 45% approval rate is lower than the 61% average for the Oak Brook Hearing Office. The 2 judges who decided cases at this office in SSA's latest file range from 45% to 81% during that period. An attorney can help you understand how to prepare your case for this bench.
Edward P. Studzinski's approval rate has varied since 2016. While his overall approval rate for the 4,649 decisions on record is 35%, his rate over the 12 months to July 31, 2026, is 45%. An attorney can help you evaluate how these trends might relate to your claim.
No, you cannot request a specific judge. The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm. Because assignment is random, you should be prepared for any judge by having your medical evidence organized with the help of an attorney.
An approval rate is a statistical summary of past decisions and does not predict the outcome of your specific hearing. Your case's success depends on the medical evidence and vocational testimony you provide. An attorney can help you build the strongest possible case regardless of which judge is assigned to you.




