SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Anne Shaughnessy

Last decided CincinnatiSep 2025
Decisions 3,463since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframes to ensure accuracy. The 53% approval rate on record since 2016 sits within the 31% to 77% range observed among the bench at the Cincinnati hearing office over the same period. While latest-period benchmarks provide broader context, they do not replace the specific record of an individual judge. These aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 53%
Decisions on record 3,463

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Shaughnessy. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Shaughnessy's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Shaughnessy
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Your judge's approval rate has fluctuated since 2016, moving from 55% in 2016 to a low of 48% in 2022, before reaching 57% in 2025. With 3,463 total decisions on record, the judge has maintained a consistent volume of activity. The recent data suggests a return to higher approval levels compared to the 2020-2022 period. This pattern may reflect shifts in the complexity of cases or changes in the evidence you present during your hearing.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Shaughnessy's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Cincinnati hearing office

Anne Shaughnessy's most recent office on record is the Cincinnati hearing office, which serves claimants across the region. This office features a bench of 14 judges whose most recent records are tied to this location. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 52%, providing a baseline for the local hearing environment. You can see the Cincinnati Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Cincinnati

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 14 judges whose most recent office on record is the Cincinnati hearing office, and their approval rates vary significantly, ranging from 31% to 77% on their since-2016 records. Five of these judges decided cases here in the SSA's latest file. For your preparation, the guidance remains the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions