SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Christopher S. Tindale

Last decided CincinnatiJul 2026
Decisions 3,449since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing Judge Tindale's performance requires looking at consistent data windows. The judge's 44% approval rate on record since 2016 sits within the 31% to 77% range observed among the 14 judges whose most recent office on record is Cincinnati. In the most recent reporting period, the judge recorded a 46% approval rate, which is 6 points lower than the office-wide rate of 52%. These figures provide statistical context for your hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 44%
Decisions on record 3,449
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Tindale Cincinnati National
Approval rate 46% 52% 58%
Fully favorable 42% — —
Denials 54% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Tindale's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Tindale
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Judge Tindale has shown variation across the 3,449 decisions on record since 2016. After an initial period of fluctuation, the judge's yearly approval rate moved from 36% in 2018 to a peak of 51% in 2025. The most recent data from 2026 shows a rate of 46% (fiscal year to date). This recent figure represents a shift from the previous year, though it remains consistent with the judge's long-term pattern of decision-making.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Tindale's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Cincinnati hearing office

The most recent office on record for Judge Tindale is the Cincinnati hearing office. This office maintains a bench of 14 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 52%, you can expect a review of your medical evidence and vocational history.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Cincinnati

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 14 judges whose most recent office on record is the Cincinnati hearing office, and 5 of them decided cases here in the latest file from July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 31% to 77% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions