SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Scott C. Shimer

Last decided Franklin TNJul 2026
Decisions 4,035since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe. While Scott C. Shimer has a 50% approval rate since 2016, his latest-period approval rate is 51%. This sits 4 points below the Franklin TN office average of 55%, 6 points below the Tennessee state average of 57%, and 7 points below the national average of 58%. These figures rely on a significant volume of decisions to provide a clear statistical picture.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 50%
Decisions on record 4,035
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Shimer Franklin TN National
Approval rate 51% 55% 58%
Fully favorable 43% — —
Denials 49% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Shimer's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Shimer
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since January 2016, Scott C. Shimer has issued 4,035 decisions. The yearly trend shows a fluctuating pattern, with approval rates reaching a high of 53% in 2017 and 2018 before dipping to 43% in 2020. In the most recent partial fiscal year, the rate was 51%. This latest period reflects a continuation of a stable pattern in his decision-making process.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Shimer's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Franklin TN hearing office

The Franklin TN hearing office serves claimants across the region. With a bench of 14 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, it handles a high volume of disability claims. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 55%, providing a benchmark for the area. You can see the Franklin TN Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Franklin TN

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 14 judges whose most recent office on record is the Franklin TN, 10 of whom decided cases in SSA's latest file through July 2026. Approval rates among this bench vary significantly, ranging from 29% to 76% on their records since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions