SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Charles Shinn

Last decided Akron OHJul 2026
Decisions 5,221since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

You can understand the approval rates for Charles Shinn by comparing his performance to the broader bench at the Akron OH hearing office. While the judge maintains a 57% approval rate since 2016, the local bench shows a wide range of outcomes from 43% to 80%. In the most recent reporting period, the judge's 57% approval rate sits 4 points above the office average of 53%. These figures reflect historical trends rather than a fixed outcome for your hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 57%
Decisions on record 5,221
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Shinn Akron OH National
Approval rate 57% 53% 58%
Fully favorable 54% — —
Denials 43% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Shinn's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Shinn
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Charles Shinn has issued 5,221 decisions. The yearly approval trend shows fluctuations, with rates ranging from a low of 47% in 2016 to a high of 66% in 2023 and 2025. The latest period shows an approval rate of 57%, which aligns closely with the long-term average. This pattern suggests a consistent approach to case evaluation, with the most recent data reflecting a continuation of this established record.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Shinn's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Akron OH hearing office

Charles Shinn's most recent office on record is the Akron OH hearing office, where he has recorded decisions through July 2026. This office maintains a bench of 13 judges whose most recent records are tied to this location. With an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 53%, you should be prepared for a thorough review of your medical evidence. You can see the Akron OH Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Akron OH

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 13 judges whose most recent office on record is the Akron OH hearing office. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 43% to 80% since 2016. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions