SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Joseph Shortill

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Portland ME Hearing Office · 2 years on the bench · 1,848 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Shortill?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's approval rate to broader benchmarks helps you understand the environment of your upcoming hearing. Judge Shortill currently trends 23 percentage points above the Portland ME office average and 27 points above the national average. These figures are derived from a substantial docket of 1,848 lifetime decisions, providing a clear view of past activity. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Metric Judge Shortill Portland ME National
Approval rate 85% 62% 58%
Fully favorable 72%
Denials 15%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Shortill's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Shortill
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY17
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a two-year tenure, Judge Shortill has demonstrated a consistent approach to disability claims. The data shows an approval rate of 86% in 2016, followed by 75% in 2017. This shift reflects the natural variance in case mix and evidence quality that occurs over time. The pattern suggests a judge who evaluates each file based on the specific medical documentation you provide.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Shortill's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Shortill? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Portland ME hearing office

The Portland ME Hearing Office serves you across the region, managing a diverse caseload of disability applications. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an average approval rate of 62%. You should expect a professional environment focused on the specific medical requirements of your claim. You can find more information on the Portland ME Hearing Office page.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning you cannot choose your judge. Within the Portland ME office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 40% to 85%. This variance highlights why focusing on your own medical evidence is the most reliable way to prepare. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions