SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Caroline Siderius

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Spokane Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 10,463 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Siderius maintains a lifetime approval rate of 70% based on 10,463 decisions. In the most recent reporting period, the judge recorded a 78% approval rate, which compares favorably to the 72% office average and exceeds the 58% national average. These metrics provide a window into historical decision-making tendencies, though aggregate rates do not predict the outcome of your specific hearing.

Metric Judge Siderius Spokane National
Approval rate 70% 72% 58%
Fully favorable 75%
Denials 22%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Siderius's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Siderius
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a 10-year tenure, the approval pattern for Judge Siderius has shifted. After a period of relative stability between 2016 and 2023, the last two years have seen an increase in approval rates, reaching 83% in 2024 and 80% in 2025. This recent trend marks a departure from earlier, more moderate approval levels. Such patterns often reflect changes in the complexity of assigned cases or evolving standards in evidence evaluation.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Siderius's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Siderius? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Spokane hearing office

The Spokane Hearing Office serves claimants across Washington and the surrounding region. It is staffed by 6 judges who manage a high volume of disability claims. The office currently maintains an average approval rate of 72%, reflecting the regional landscape of SSDI adjudication. You can learn more about the local bench by visiting the Spokane Hearing Office page.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Within the Spokane Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 48% to 78%. This variance highlights why understanding the local judicial environment is useful for your preparation. Guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions