Philip J. Simon's most recent SSA record (September 2021) is at the Pasadena hearing office. Across the 1,581 decisions on record since 2016, 68% have been approved. Judges whose most recent office on record is this one range from 35% to 70% on their since-2016 records, and case assignment is random, so the judge you draw matters. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for your hearing.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. The 68% approval rate for Philip J. Simon reflects all decisions on record since 2016, which we compare against the 35% to 70% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is Pasadena. This docket size provides a clear view of historical patterns. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.
SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Simon. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 24, 2021. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Simon's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
The approval rate for Philip J. Simon remained relatively steady between 2016 and 2020, consistently hovering near the 70% mark. The data shows a shift in the final recorded period of 2021, where the approval rate moved to 54% across 81 decisions. Because this judge's record spans 1,581 total decisions, these fluctuations are visible against a backdrop of long-term consistency. This pattern suggests that your case outcomes may vary depending on the specific evidence presented in your file.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Simon's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Pasadena hearing office
Philip J. Simon's most recent office on record is the Pasadena hearing office, which serves the surrounding California region. This office is home to 11 judges whose most recent records are based there. You can generally expect a standard hearing process focused on medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can see the Pasadena Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Pasadena
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is effectively random. There are 11 judges whose most recent office on record is Pasadena, with approval rates ranging from 35% to 70% on their since-2016 records. Five of these judges decided cases in the most recent SSA file. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Philip J. Simon has an approval rate of 68% based on 1,581 decisions since 2016. This sits within the 35% to 70% range observed among the 11 judges whose most recent office on record is Pasadena. An attorney can help you prepare for the specific expectations of this bench.
The approval rate for Philip J. Simon was steady for several years, generally staying between 66% and 71% from 2016 through 2020. The most recent data from 2021 shows a rate of 54%. An attorney can help you understand how these trends might relate to your specific case.
No. The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm to ensure efficiency. You cannot choose your judge, which is why working with an attorney to prepare a strong case is essential regardless of who is assigned. An attorney can help you prepare for your hearing.
An approval rate is a probability cloud based on past decisions, not a prediction for your specific hearing. While Philip J. Simon has approved 68% of cases since 2016, your outcome depends on your medical records and testimony. An attorney can help you build the strongest possible case.




