SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Carolyn Smilie

Last decided AlexandriaJul 2026
Decisions 3,424since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes to ensure accuracy. While the long-term record since 2016 provides a broad view of decision history, recent performance can differ significantly. We evaluate these figures against the broader bench at the Alexandria hearing office to provide context for your hearing. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 43%
Decisions on record 3,424
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Smilie Alexandria National
Approval rate 67% 55% 58%
Fully favorable 62% — —
Denials 33% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Smilie's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Smilie
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Carolyn Smilie has shown an upward trend. After years of steady outcomes, the most recent period shows an increase in approvals, reaching 67% in the latest reporting window. This latest period reflects a departure from the historical average on record, which may be influenced by changes in case mix or the quality of evidence presented in recent hearings.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Smilie's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Alexandria hearing office

The most recent office on record for Carolyn Smilie is the Alexandria hearing office. This office maintains a bench of 10 judges who manage disability claims. The office-wide approval rate in the latest period was 55%, providing a benchmark for the local judicial environment. For more information, see the Alexandria hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Alexandria

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you draw is essentially random. There are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 7 of them having decided cases in the latest file from July 2026. Approval rates across this bench range from 26% to 67% on their records since 2016. Guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions