SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Regina Sobrino

Last decided FlintSep 2025
Decisions 3,596since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframe to ensure accuracy. The 60% approval rate for Regina Sobrino reflects all decisions on record since 2016, which can be measured against the 42% to 81% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is Flint. With 3,596 decisions on record, this data provides a stable view of past activity. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 60%
Decisions on record 3,596

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Sobrino. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 26, 2025. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Sobrino's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Sobrino
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Regina Sobrino has fluctuated over the years, showing a peak of 77% in 2016 and 50% in 2025. Across 3,596 decisions on record since 2016, the yearly trend shows periods of both higher and lower approval, reflecting changes in case mix or evidence quality over time. This variable pattern is common in high-volume disability dockets.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Sobrino's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Flint hearing office

Regina Sobrino's most recent office on record is the Flint Hearing Office, which serves you if you are in Michigan. This office maintains a bench of 9 judges whose most recent record is at this location. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on your medical evidence and work history. You can see the Flint Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Flint

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is Flint, with approval rates ranging from 42% to 81% on their since-2016 records. Because approval rates vary across the bench, understanding the local context is helpful. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions