SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Claire R. Strong

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Montgomery Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 22,027 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Strong?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's history to broader benchmarks provides context for your upcoming hearing. Judge Strong’s lifetime approval rate of 78% is higher than the latest national average of 58% and the Montgomery office average of 69%. These figures are derived from 22,027 lifetime decisions. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Strong Montgomery National
Approval rate 78% 69% 58%
Fully favorable 85%
Denials 10%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Strong's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Strong
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a 10-year tenure, Judge Strong has demonstrated a consistent upward trend in approval rates. Starting at 68% in 2016, the rate has climbed to 90% in the most recent reporting period. This shift reflects a pattern of increasing allowance rates over the last decade. The recent data shows a continuation of this trend, which may be influenced by changes in case evidence or the specific types of claims presented to the court.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Strong's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Strong? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Montgomery hearing office

The Montgomery Hearing Office serves you and other claimants across Alabama, managing a high volume of disability cases. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an office-wide latest approval rate of 69%. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony. You can view the Montgomery Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Within the Montgomery office, lifetime approval rates among the bench range from 53% to 78%. Because you cannot choose your judge, understanding the office-wide environment is helpful. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions