SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Dianne S. Mantel

Last decided Toledo OHJul 2026
Decisions 4,006since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rates for Dianne S. Mantel reflect a significant volume of cases decided since 2016. When comparing these figures, it is important to look at the 45% approval rate on record against the 30% to 77% range seen among other judges whose most recent office on record is the Toledo OH hearing office. Latest-period data shows a 39% approval rate for this judge, which sits 15 points below the office's latest-period rate of 54%. These figures represent historical trends rather than a fixed outcome for your case.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 45%
Decisions on record 4,006
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Mantel Toledo OH National
Approval rate 39% 54% 58%
Fully favorable 29% — —
Denials 61% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Mantel's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Mantel
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Dianne S. Mantel has shown notable fluctuations. After starting at 35% in 2016, the rate experienced a period of growth, reaching 54% in 2024 before shifting to 39% in the most recent partial fiscal year. With 4,006 total decisions on record, these shifts highlight the impact of varying case evidence and legal standards over time. The latest period reflects a departure from the higher approval rates observed in the mid-2020s.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Mantel's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Toledo OH hearing office

The Toledo OH hearing office serves you and other claimants across the region. With 10 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, the office maintains a latest-period approval rate of 54%. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on the medical and vocational evidence presented in your file. You can see the Toledo OH hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Toledo OH

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 10 judges whose most recent office on record is the Toledo OH hearing office, 7 of whom decided cases in the latest file through July 2026. These judges show a wide range of approval rates from 30% to 77% on their records since 2016. Your preparation remains consistent regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions