SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Linda A. Stagno

Last decided Long IslandJul 2026
Decisions 1,834since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same timeframes. While you can see a 77% approval rate across Linda A. Stagno's 1,834 decisions on record since 2016, her most recent performance shows a 79% approval rate. This latest-period figure sits 8 points above the office average of 71%, 17 points above the state average of 62%, and 21 points above the national average of 58%. These figures reflect past decisions rather than a guarantee of your outcome.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 77%
Decisions on record 1,834
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Stagno Long Island National
Approval rate 79% 71% 58%
Fully favorable 71% — —
Denials 21% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Stagno's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Stagno
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Linda A. Stagno has maintained a consistent approval pattern across 1,834 decisions. While yearly rates have fluctuated, the trend has remained steady, with a recent approval rate of 79% in the latest period. This latest figure aligns closely with her long-term average, providing a baseline for how your case might be reviewed.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Stagno's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Long Island hearing office

Linda A. Stagno's most recent office on record is the Long Island hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. This office serves claimants across the region and maintains a bench of 12 judges. With an office-wide latest approval rate of 71%, you can expect a review of your medical and vocational evidence. You can see the Long Island Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Long Island

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 12 judges whose most recent office on record is the Long Island office. Approval rates among this bench range from 48% to 83% on their records since 2016. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions