SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Linda A. Stagno

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 1,834 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval data for Linda A. Stagno reflects a record of 1,834 decisions. When comparing her latest-period performance to the broader office, she currently maintains an approval rate 8 points higher than the Long Island office average. These figures are based on the most recent reporting period to ensure a like-for-like comparison. These rates reflect historical trends rather than future outcomes.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 77%
Decisions on record 1,834
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Stagno Long Island National
Approval rate 79% 71% 58%
Fully favorable 71%
Denials 21%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Stagno's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Stagno
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the approval rate for Linda A. Stagno has shown a stable trajectory. While the rate has fluctuated between 71% and 86% over the years, the most recent data shows a 79% approval rate. This performance indicates a consistent approach to evaluating your disability claim.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Stagno's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Long Island hearing office

The Long Island hearing office serves claimants throughout the region, operating as a key hub for New York disability hearings. With 12 judges on record, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 71%. You can expect a professional environment where evidence quality remains the primary factor in every decision. You can visit the Long Island Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. At the Long Island hearing office, there are 12 judges on record since 2016, 7 of whom reported in the latest period. The lifetime approval rates across this bench range from 48% to 83%. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions