SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Yvonne K. Stam

Last decided RaleighSep 2020
Decisions 1,761since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The 61% approval rate for Yvonne K. Stam reflects all decisions on record since 2016. This can be measured against the 27% to 74% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is Raleigh. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding the hearing environment, though they do not predict the outcome of your specific hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 61%
Decisions on record 1,761

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Stam. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 25, 2020. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Stam's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Stam
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY20
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval trend for Yvonne K. Stam across 1,761 decisions on record since 2016 shows a period of fluctuation. After an initial approval rate of 63% in 2016, the figures shifted to 66% in 2017 before declining to 56% in 2019, followed by a recovery to 59% in 2020. This pattern indicates that decision-making has varied over the years, reflecting changes in case complexity or evidentiary requirements.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Stam's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Raleigh hearing office

Yvonne K. Stam's most recent office on record is the Raleigh hearing office. This office is part of a larger network of hearing locations where 17 judges have their most recent record. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 61%, providing a general context for the local hearing environment.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Raleigh

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the Raleigh hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 27% to 74% on their since-2016 records. Because each judge evaluates evidence differently, understanding the broader office bench is helpful for your preparation.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions