SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. David L. Stephens

Last decided BirminghamSep 2016
Decisions 67since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Understanding how your judge compares to their peers can provide helpful context for your upcoming hearing. The approval rate for David L. Stephens is based on 67 decisions on record since 2016. When compared to the 23 judges whose most recent office on record is the Birmingham hearing office, this rate sits within a range of 28% to 85%. These figures reflect historical trends rather than specific outcomes for your case.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 66%
Decisions on record 67

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Stephens. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2016. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Stephens's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Stephens
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for David L. Stephens has remained consistent based on the 67 decisions on record since 2016. In 2016, the judge maintained a 66% approval rate. Because case assignment is random, this trend serves as a historical reference point rather than a guarantee of how your specific evidence will be evaluated.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Stephens's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Birmingham hearing office

David L. Stephens's most recent office on record is the Birmingham hearing office, with decisions there through September 2016. This office serves you if you are in the region and is part of a network dedicated to processing disability appeals. With a bench of 23 judges, the office handles a diverse range of cases, and you can expect a formal administrative process focused on your medical and vocational evidence.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Birmingham

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 23 judges whose most recent office on record is the Birmingham hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 28% to 85% on their since-2016 records. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions