SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. David L. Stephens

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Birmingham Hearing Office · 1 years on the bench · 603 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

When evaluating your claim, it is helpful to understand how a judge's history compares to broader benchmarks. Judge Stephens maintains a 66% lifetime approval rate based on 603 lifetime decisions. This performance is 14 points higher than the current Birmingham Hearing Office average of 52% and exceeds the national average of 58%. These figures reflect historical trends rather than specific outcomes for your case.

Metric Judge Stephens Birmingham National
Approval rate 66% 52% 58%
Fully favorable 56%
Denials 34%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Stephens's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Stephens
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Throughout his tenure, Judge Stephens has demonstrated a steady approach to disability adjudication. His 66% approval rate reflects a consistent evaluation of evidence over his 1 year on the bench. Because he has presided over 603 lifetime decisions, his record provides a stable baseline for understanding his typical decision-making process. This pattern suggests a focused application of Social Security Administration guidelines to the cases presented before him.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Stephens's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Stephens? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Birmingham hearing office

The Birmingham Hearing Office serves a large population across Alabama, managing a high volume of disability claims. With a bench of 6 judges, the office maintains an average approval rate of 52%. You should be prepared for a thorough review of your medical documentation and vocational evidence. You can see the Birmingham Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. Across the Birmingham Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges vary significantly, ranging from 38% to 77%. This variance highlights why understanding the local bench is important. You can find more information on the office's overall performance on the Birmingham Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions