SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Nathaniel E. Strickler

Last decided PeoriaJul 2026
Decisions 1,376since 2022

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing performance requires looking at consistent data windows. While the judge has an approval rate of 68% since December 2022, it is helpful to see how this aligns with the broader bench at the Peoria hearing office, where peers range from 32% to 68% on their records. In the most recent reporting period, the judge's 68% approval rate sits 10 percentage points above the office average of 58%. These aggregate rates reflect past decisions rather than future outcomes.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2022
Approval rate 68%
Decisions on record 1,376
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Strickler Peoria National
Approval rate 68% 58% 58%
Fully favorable 57% — —
Denials 32% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Strickler's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Strickler
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY23FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since December 2022, the approval rate for Nathaniel E. Strickler has remained steady. The judge issued 173 decisions in 2023 at a 67% rate, 502 decisions in 2024 at 69%, and 471 decisions in 2025 at 67%. The 2026 fiscal year-to-date data shows 425 decisions with a 68% approval rate. This consistent pattern indicates a stable approach to case evaluation over the observed period.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Strickler's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Peoria hearing office

Nathaniel E. Strickler's most recent office on record is the Peoria hearing office, with the last recorded decision there in July 2026. This office serves claimants in Illinois. With 8 judges on the bench, the office maintains an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 58%. You can expect a standard hearing process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Peoria

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 8 judges whose most recent office on record is the Peoria hearing office, and 5 of them decided cases here in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary, ranging from 32% to 68% on their records. Your preparation remains the same regardless of which judge is assigned to your case.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions