Edward F. Sweeney's most recent office on record is the Hartford hearing office, with decisions there through July 2026. Across the 3,635 decisions on record since January 2016, 50% have been approved. Judges whose most recent office on record is this one range from 27% to 74% on their since-2016 records, and case assignment is random. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare for your hearing.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent timeframes. While you see a 50% approval rate since 2016, recent data shows a 51% approval rate in the latest period. This sits 8 points below the 59% office-wide latest-period average. These figures are based on a docket of 3,635 decisions on record since 2016. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.
Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Sweeney's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
The approval rate for Edward F. Sweeney has remained steady since 2016, with minor annual fluctuations. After starting at 45% in 2016, the rate reached 51% in the latest partial fiscal year. With 3,635 total decisions on record, the judge maintains a consistent approach to case evaluation. The recent 51% approval rate aligns closely with the long-term average, suggesting a stable decision-making pattern over the last decade.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Sweeney's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Hartford hearing office
The most recent office on record for Edward F. Sweeney is the Hartford hearing office. This office maintains a bench of 9 judges who handle a diverse range of disability claims. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 59%, reflecting the local environment for SSDI hearings.
Other judges whose most recent office on record is Hartford
The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is this one, with 6 of them having decided cases in the latest file through July 2026. Approval rates for this bench range from 27% to 74% on their since-2016 records.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Judge Sweeney's 50% approval rate since 2016 falls within the 27% to 74% range observed among the 9 judges whose most recent office on record is Hartford. Because case assignment is random, an attorney can help you prepare for the specific requirements of this bench.
The approval rate has remained steady, moving from 45% in 2016 to 51% in the most recent partial fiscal year. This consistency across 3,635 decisions on record suggests a stable approach to case review. An attorney can help you understand how these trends might apply to your specific medical evidence.
No, you cannot choose your judge. The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm to ensure efficiency. Since you cannot control your judge assignment, an attorney can help you prepare a strong case regardless of who is presiding.
An SSDI hearing is a non-adversarial proceeding where the judge gathers facts to determine if you meet the definition of disability. You will likely testify about your limitations, and a vocational expert may provide input on available work. An attorney can help you prepare your testimony and organize your medical records for the hearing.
An approval rate is a probability cloud based on past decisions, not a prediction for your specific hearing. While Judge Sweeney has approved 50% of cases since 2016, your outcome depends primarily on the quality of your medical evidence and how well you document your functional limitations. An attorney can help you ensure your evidence meets the necessary standards.




