SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Edward F. Sweeney

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Hartford Hearing Office · 10 years on the bench · 20,204 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Sweeney?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Sweeney maintains a lifetime approval rate of 50% based on 20,204 total decisions. In the most recent reporting period, the judge recorded a 53% approval rate, which compares to the 60% average for the Hartford Hearing Office and the 58% national average. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding the judge's history. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Sweeney Hartford National
Approval rate 50% 60% 58%
Fully favorable 48%
Denials 47%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Sweeney's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Sweeney
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY25
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over a 10-year tenure, Judge Sweeney has demonstrated a consistent decision-making pattern. While the lifetime approval rate stands at 50%, yearly performance has fluctuated between 44% and 55%. The most recent data indicates a 53% approval rate, suggesting the judge's current approach remains aligned with historical trends. This stability helps provide a clearer picture of what to expect during your hearing process.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Sweeney's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Sweeney? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Hartford hearing office

The Hartford Hearing Office serves you across Connecticut and parts of the surrounding region. With a bench of 6 judges, this office manages a high volume of disability claims. The office-wide approval rate currently sits at 60%, reflecting the local administrative environment. You can see the Hartford Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The SSA uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to Judge Sweeney is essentially random. Across the Hartford Hearing Office, lifetime approval rates among the 6 judges range from 27% to 56%. This variance underscores why understanding the local judicial environment is important for your claim. You can find more information on the Hartford Hearing Office page.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions