SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Kathleen H. Switzer

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Salt Lake City Hearing Office · 5 years on the bench · 7,792 lifetime decisions

Hearing scheduled with Judge Switzer?

Free Benefits Review →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Judge Switzer's approval rate is measured against the Salt Lake City Hearing Office and national benchmarks to provide context for your upcoming hearing. With a docket of 7,792 lifetime decisions, the data offers a look at historical trends. Currently, her approval rate stands 23 points above the local office average and 19 points above the 58% national average. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Metric Judge Switzer Salt Lake City National
Approval rate 77% 54% 58%
Fully favorable 65%
Denials 23%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Switzer's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Switzer
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY20
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over 5 years on the bench, Judge Switzer has maintained a consistent approval pattern. While yearly rates fluctuated between 74% and 89%, the overall trend remains steady. The most recent reporting period shows a continuation of this pattern, providing a baseline for understanding how your case may be evaluated.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Switzer's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Switzer? Free, confidential — see if you qualify for SSDI.

Free Benefits Review
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Salt Lake City hearing office

The Salt Lake City Hearing Office serves a broad population across Utah, managing a high volume of disability claims with a bench of 6 judges. The office-wide latest approval rate of 54% reflects the nature of the cases processed in this region. You can visit the Salt Lake City Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to Judge Switzer is essentially random. Across the Salt Lake City Hearing Office, the 6 ALJs range from 28% to 77% in lifetime approval rates, highlighting the importance of your individual case presentation. Regardless of which judge is assigned to your hearing, the fundamental requirements for proving disability remain the same.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Free Benefits Review

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions