SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. David W. Thompson

Last decided Salt Lake CityJul 2026
Decisions 4,379since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same period to ensure accuracy. While your judge's overall approval rate since 2016 is 36%, his latest-period approval rate of 37% sits 15 points below the Salt Lake City office's latest-period average of 52%. With 4,379 total decisions on record, this data provides a look at past outcomes. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 36%
Decisions on record 4,379
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Thompson Salt Lake City National
Approval rate 37% 52% 58%
Fully favorable 36% — —
Denials 63% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Thompson's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Thompson
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for David W. Thompson has fluctuated since 2016. After a low of 30% in 2023, the rate reached 42% in 2025 before settling at 37% in the partial 2026 fiscal year. These 4,379 decisions on record indicate that the judge's approval pattern is not static. The recent figures suggest a return toward the historical average following the volatility observed in the middle of the data window.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Thompson's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Salt Lake City hearing office

The Salt Lake City Hearing Office serves you and other claimants across Utah and the surrounding region. This office has a bench of 9 judges whose most recent office on record is this location. The office-wide latest-period approval rate is 52%, which provides context for the local hearing environment. For more information, see the Salt Lake City Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Salt Lake City

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 9 judges whose most recent office on record is the Salt Lake City office, and 4 of them decided cases here in the latest file period ending July 2026. Approval rates for this bench range from 28% to 85% on their records since 2016. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions