SSDI Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Alisa M. Tapia

SSDI Administrative Law Judge at the Tallahassee Fl Oho Hearing Office · 6 years on the bench · 6,910 lifetime decisions

Check My Benefits →
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing a judge's historical approval rate to office and national benchmarks provides context for your hearing. Judge Tapia has maintained a 34% approval rate over 6,910 lifetime decisions, which differs from the current 63% average at the Tallahassee FL OHO and the 58% national average. These statistics offer a view of long-term trends rather than predictions for your specific hearing.

Metric Judge Tapia Tallahassee Fl Oho National
Approval rate 34% 63% 58%
Fully favorable 29%
Denials 66%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Tapia's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Tapia
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY21
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total dispositions excluding dismissals.

Decision pattern

Over 6 years on the bench, Judge Tapia has presided over 6,910 decisions. Her yearly approval trend shows variance, moving from 39% in 2017 to 28% in 2021. This pattern suggests that while her approach has shifted over time, it remains consistent with her career-long averages. These fluctuations often reflect changes in the types of cases assigned to the office or shifts in evidentiary standards.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Tapia's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing with Judge Tapia? See if a free benefits review fits your case.

Check My Benefits
Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tallahassee Fl Oho hearing office

The Tallahassee FL OHO serves you and other applicants across the Florida region, managing a high volume of disability hearings. With 6 judges on the bench, the office maintains an average approval rate of 63%. You should be prepared for a thorough review of your medical records and vocational history when appearing at this office.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. At the Tallahassee FL OHO, the bench includes 6 judges with lifetime approval rates ranging from 34% to 67%. Because you cannot choose your judge, focusing on the strength of your medical evidence is the most effective way to prepare.

Your odds change dramatically with a lawyer

SSDI hearing approval rates — represented vs. on your own

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants
Check My Benefits

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions