SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Alisa M. Tapia

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 1,138 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at consistent data sets, specifically lifetime records against the broader office bench. The office-wide lifetime approval-rate range spans from 34% to 77%, providing context for how individual judges compare within the Tallahassee FL OHO. These figures are derived from 1,138 decisions on record since 2016. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 34%
Decisions on record 1,138

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Tapia. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 24, 2021. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Tapia's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Tapia
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY17FY21
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The decision pattern for Alisa M. Tapia shows a fluctuating trend across the data window starting in 2016. After an initial 46% approval rate in 2017, the figures shifted, with the most recent data from 2021 showing a 28% approval rate. This variation across 1,138 total decisions suggests that case outcomes have not followed a single linear path. These shifts reflect the evolving nature of your case mix and evidence quality.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Tapia's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Tallahassee Fl OHO hearing office

The Tallahassee FL OHO serves claimants across the Florida region, managing a diverse caseload through its 9-judge bench. The office maintains a consistent operational standard, though individual judge approval rates vary widely. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on your medical and vocational evidence. See the Tallahassee FL OHO Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 9 judges on record at this office since 2016, 5 of whom are reported in the latest SSA period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 34% to 77% over their respective lifetime records. You can find more information on the Tallahassee FL OHO Hearing Office page.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions