SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Sean Teehan

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 2,924 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Comparing Sean Teehan's record to the broader Boston bench provides context for your upcoming hearing. While his lifetime approval rate sits at 37%, the office-wide lifetime range for all judges on record spans from 37% to 75%. In the latest reporting period, his approval rate was 36%, compared to the office-wide latest-period rate of 54%. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 37%
Decisions on record 2,924
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge Teehan Boston National
Approval rate 36% 54% 58%
Fully favorable 29%
Denials 64%

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Teehan's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Teehan
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Sean Teehan has issued 2,924 decisions since 2016. His approval rate has remained relatively steady over the years, showing a consistent pattern in his approach to disability claims. While the latest-period approval rate of 36% is slightly lower than his lifetime average, it remains within the established range of his historical record. This consistency suggests a stable decision-making pattern that has persisted throughout the available data window.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Teehan's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Boston hearing office

The Boston hearing office serves you throughout Massachusetts and the surrounding region. It maintains a bench of 14 judges on record, with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 54%. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on the medical evidence supporting your disability claim. You can see the Boston Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 14 judges on record at this office since 2016, 6 of whom reported in the SSA's latest period. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 37% to 75% on a lifetime basis.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions