SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Michael D. Tucevich

Last decided PhoenixSep 2018
Decisions 773since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The 59% approval rate for Michael D. Tucevich reflects all decisions on record since 2016, which can be measured against the 32% to 78% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is the Phoenix hearing office. These figures provide a statistical baseline for understanding how different judges have approached their dockets. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 59%
Decisions on record 773

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Tucevich. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 28, 2018. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Tucevich's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Tucevich
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY18
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Michael D. Tucevich shows a downward trend across the 773 decisions on record since January 2016. You can see an approval rate of 66% in 2016, which shifted to 56% in 2017 and 54% in 2018. This pattern reflects a steady decline over the period of the judge's recorded activity at the Phoenix office. Such shifts in approval rates often occur due to changes in the types of cases presented or evolving standards for medical evidence.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Tucevich's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Phoenix hearing office

Michael D. Tucevich's most recent office on record is the Phoenix hearing office, which serves you if you are in Arizona. With 12 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, the bench represents a wide spectrum of decision patterns. You can see the Phoenix hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Phoenix

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 12 judges whose most recent office on record is the Phoenix hearing office, and their approval rates since 2016 range from 32% to 78%. This variance highlights why understanding the broader bench is useful for you. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions