SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Frederick Upshall Jr.

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 1,577 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rate for Frederick Upshall Jr. is calculated from 1,577 lifetime decisions recorded between 2016 and 2019. This figure provides a statistical baseline when compared to the 41% to 89% approval range observed across the Albuquerque hearing office bench. These numbers reflect a significant volume of cases, offering a stable view of past judicial activity. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for individual hearings.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 64%
Decisions on record 1,577

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Upshall Jr.. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 27, 2019. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Upshall Jr.'s docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Upshall Jr.
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY19
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The decision record for Frederick Upshall Jr. shows a notable trend over the 2016 to 2019 period. After an initial approval rate of 62% in 2016, the rate rose to 71% in both 2017 and 2018 before shifting to 52% in 2019. This pattern highlights how approval rates can fluctuate over time based on the specific mix of cases and evidence presented. The recent shift in the final year of the record reflects a change from his earlier, higher-approval period.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Upshall Jr.'s bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Albuquerque hearing office

The Albuquerque hearing office serves residents across New Mexico, managing a diverse caseload of disability claims. The office is supported by a bench of 16 judges on record, ensuring that hearings are processed through a structured administrative system. You can expect a formal environment where evidence quality is the primary driver of case outcomes. You can see the /disability-benefits/hearing-offices/albuquerque-NM Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Albuquerque hearing office utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment is essentially random. There are 16 judges on record at this office since 2016, with 7 judges currently reporting in the latest SSA data. Approval rates across this bench vary widely, ranging from 41% to 89%. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions