SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Peter J. Valentino

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 1,044 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rates for Peter J. Valentino reflect his history of adjudicating Social Security Disability Insurance claims since 2016. When evaluating these figures, compare his 62% lifetime performance against the broader range of 37% to 68% seen among his peers at the San Diego office. These statistics are derived from a docket of 1,044 lifetime decisions.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 62%
Decisions on record 1,044

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Valentino. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 24, 2021. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Valentino's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Valentino
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY21
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The decision pattern for Peter J. Valentino shows a steady trajectory over the recorded period. Starting with a 56% approval rate in 2016, the data indicates fluctuations that reached a peak of 67% in 2020 before settling at 58% in 2021. This record of 1,044 lifetime decisions suggests a consistent approach to evaluating evidence.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Valentino's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the San Diego hearing office

The San Diego hearing office serves claimants throughout the region, maintaining a bench of 15 judges on record. As part of the Office of Hearings Operations, this location manages a high volume of cases with an office-wide latest-period approval rate of 58%. You can expect a formal process focused on your medical evidence and vocational testimony.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 15 judges on record at this office since 2016. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 37% to 68% on a lifetime basis.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions