SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Jill Lolley Vincent

Last decided BirminghamSep 2018
Decisions 458since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Understanding how your judge compares to their peers provides helpful context for your hearing. The approval rate for Jill Lolley Vincent is 58% based on 458 decisions on record since 2016. This figure sits within the range of 28% to 85% observed among the 23 judges whose most recent office on record is the Birmingham hearing office.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 58%
Decisions on record 458

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Vincent. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 28, 2018. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Vincent's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Vincent
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY18
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for Jill Lolley Vincent was 59% in 2016 over 281 decisions, 58% in 2017 over 204 decisions, and 48% in 2018 over 54 decisions. These figures reflect the judge's activity during the recorded period ending in September 2018.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Vincent's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Birmingham hearing office

The Birmingham hearing office serves you and other claimants across Alabama. With 23 judges whose most recent office on record at this location, the office manages a diverse volume of cases. You can expect a standard administrative process focused on the medical and vocational evidence you present.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Birmingham

The Social Security Administration assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning your judge is assigned randomly. There are 23 judges whose most recent office on record is the Birmingham hearing office, with approval rates ranging from 28% to 85% on their since-2016 records.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions