SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. David B. Washington

Last decided MinneapolisSep 2022
Decisions 3,058since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

Comparing approval rates requires looking at data from the same time periods to ensure accuracy. The 67% approval rate for David B. Washington reflects every decision on record since 2016, which we compare against the 33% to 68% range of other judges whose most recent office on record is the Minneapolis Hearing Office. These figures are derived from a substantial docket of 3,058 decisions on record, providing a stable view of past patterns. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 67%
Decisions on record 3,058

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Washington. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 30, 2022. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Washington's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Washington
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY22
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The approval rate for David B. Washington has shown variation across the 3,058 decisions on record since 2016. After an initial period of stability, the yearly trend experienced fluctuations, including a notable increase in the final year of the data window. These shifts often stem from changes in the complexity of cases or the quality of medical evidence you present. The pattern suggests that while the judge has maintained a consistent baseline, the recent data reflects a shift in outcomes.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Washington's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Minneapolis hearing office

David B. Washington's most recent office on record is the Minneapolis Hearing Office, which serves you if you are in Minnesota and the surrounding region. This office is staffed by 14 judges whose most recent office on record is this location, each managing a distinct docket of disability claims. You can expect a formal hearing process where the thoroughness of your medical documentation is critical. You can see the Minneapolis Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Minneapolis

The Social Security Administration uses a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 14 judges whose most recent office on record is the Minneapolis Hearing Office, and their approval rates range from 33% to 68% on their since-2016 records. Because this variance exists across the bench, understanding the general environment of the office is helpful. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions