Eric Weiss is an SSA Administrative Law Judge at the Albuquerque hearing office. Across the 2,179 decisions on record since 2016, 54% have been approved. The office's 16 judges range from 41% to 89% on their lifetime records, and case assignment is random, so the judge you draw matters. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing. An attorney can help you prepare your case for the specific requirements of your hearing.
This page presents publicly available SSA Office of Hearings Operations disposition data, with no editorial rating or evaluation. ALJs are independent decisionmakers; aggregate statistics describe past patterns, not predictions of how any individual case will be decided. Information here is provided for hearing preparation, not as legal advice.
Approval rates
Understanding how a judge compares to their peers is a vital part of your hearing preparation. The Albuquerque office features a bench with lifetime approval rates ranging from 41% to 89%. Because Eric Weiss has a record of 2,179 lifetime decisions, his approval rate provides a clear view of his historical decision-making tendencies. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.
SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Weiss. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 24, 2021. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.
Approval rate over time
Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Weiss's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.
Decision pattern
Since 2016, the decision pattern for Eric Weiss has shown fluctuations. After an initial approval rate of 45% in 2016, his annual figures trended upward, reaching a peak of 60% in 2020. The most recent data from 2021 shows an approval rate of 55%, indicating that his recent decisions remain consistent with his long-term average. This trend suggests that while individual case outcomes vary, his approach to evaluating evidence has remained steady over the years.
Preparing for an SSDI hearing
The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Weiss's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.
- Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
- Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
- Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
- Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.
About the Albuquerque hearing office
The Albuquerque hearing office serves claimants throughout New Mexico, managing a high volume of disability cases. The office bench consists of 16 judges on record, all of whom operate under the same federal regulations. You can expect a formal hearing environment where the quality of medical documentation is the primary factor in the outcome. You can see the Albuquerque Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.
Other judges at this hearing office
The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 16 judges on record at this office since 2016, 7 of whom reported in the SSA's latest period. With such a wide range of approval rates across the bench, it is important to focus on the strength of your medical evidence. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.
Approval rates change with a lawyer
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.
Frequently asked questions
Eric Weiss holds a 54% lifetime approval rate, which sits within the broader office range of 41% to 89%. Because every case is unique, comparing these averages is only one step in your preparation. An attorney can help you evaluate how your specific medical evidence aligns with the standards applied in this office.
Yes, the data shows variation in his approval patterns. While he started with a 45% approval rate in 2016, his annual rates have shifted, reaching as high as 60% in 2020. An attorney can help you understand how these historical trends might relate to the current requirements for your specific disability claim.
No, you cannot request a specific judge. The SSA assigns cases using a workload-balancing algorithm to ensure efficiency and fairness. Since you cannot choose your judge, an attorney can help you prepare a robust case that meets the evidentiary standards regardless of who is assigned to your hearing.
An SSDI hearing is a formal but non-adversarial proceeding where a judge reviews your medical records and hears testimony. You may be questioned about your work history and daily limitations. An attorney can help you prepare for these questions and ensure your testimony clearly explains your inability to work.
A judge's approval rate is a reflection of past decisions, not a guarantee of a future outcome. While Eric Weiss has approved 54% of his 2,179 lifetime decisions, your case outcome depends primarily on the medical evidence you provide. An attorney can help you identify and fill gaps in your medical record to strengthen your claim.



