SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Eric Weiss

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 2,179 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

Understanding how a judge compares to their peers is a vital part of your hearing preparation. The Albuquerque office features a bench with lifetime approval rates ranging from 41% to 89%. Because Eric Weiss has a record of 2,179 lifetime decisions, his approval rate provides a clear view of his historical decision-making tendencies. Aggregate rates describe past decisions, not predictions for your individual hearing.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 54%
Decisions on record 2,179

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Weiss. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 24, 2021. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Weiss's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Weiss
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY21
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, the decision pattern for Eric Weiss has shown fluctuations. After an initial approval rate of 45% in 2016, his annual figures trended upward, reaching a peak of 60% in 2020. The most recent data from 2021 shows an approval rate of 55%, indicating that his recent decisions remain consistent with his long-term average. This trend suggests that while individual case outcomes vary, his approach to evaluating evidence has remained steady over the years.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Weiss's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Albuquerque hearing office

The Albuquerque hearing office serves claimants throughout New Mexico, managing a high volume of disability cases. The office bench consists of 16 judges on record, all of whom operate under the same federal regulations. You can expect a formal hearing environment where the quality of medical documentation is the primary factor in the outcome. You can see the Albuquerque Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Social Security Administration utilizes a workload-balancing algorithm to assign cases, meaning your assignment to a specific judge is essentially random. There are 16 judges on record at this office since 2016, 7 of whom reported in the SSA's latest period. With such a wide range of approval rates across the bench, it is important to focus on the strength of your medical evidence. For preparation purposes, the guidance is the same regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions