SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. Richard West

Last decided NewarkJul 2026
Decisions 3,557since 2016

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review

Approval rates

The approval rate for Richard West is calculated from 3,557 decisions on record since 2016. When comparing this to the Newark office bench, which ranges from 20% to 73% in approval rates over the same period, the data provides a clear view of how this judge compares to peers. In the most recent reporting period, Richard West maintained a 62% approval rate, which is 7 percentage points higher than the Newark office average of 55%.

All decisions on record SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 65%
Decisions on record 3,557
Latest SSA reporting period July 31, 2026
Metric Judge West Newark National
Approval rate 62% 55% 58%
Fully favorable 52% — —
Denials 38% — —

Office- and national-level breakdowns of fully favorable vs denial rates aren't currently published by SSA in the per-office disposition data. The judge's own breakdown is the detail we have today.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge West's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge West
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY26
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

Since 2016, Richard West has maintained a consistent approval pattern, with annual rates generally fluctuating between 59% and 67%. While the 2026 fiscal year-to-date rate of 62% shows a slight shift, it remains within the established range of historical performance. With 3,557 total decisions on record, the data indicates a stable approach to case evaluation.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge West's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Newark hearing office

The Newark hearing office serves you and other claimants throughout the region and maintains a diverse bench of 17 judges. As of the latest reporting period, the office-wide approval rate stood at 55%. You should be prepared for a thorough review of your medical evidence and work history. You can see the Newark Hearing Office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges whose most recent office on record is Newark

The Social Security Administration assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. There are 17 judges whose most recent office on record is the Newark office, and 10 of them decided cases here in SSA's latest file through July 2026. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 20% to 73% since 2016.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
1×
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions