SSA Administrative Law Judge

Hon. G. Ross Wheatley

Position Administrative Law Judge
On record SSA records since 2016
Decisions 630 lifetime

Hearing scheduled?

Free Benefits Review
Free
2 minutes
Confidential

Approval rates

The approval rate for G. Ross Wheatley is based on 630 lifetime decisions recorded between 2016 and 2017. This figure provides a statistical baseline when compared to the 23% to 82% lifetime approval range seen across the Stockton hearing office bench. Because case assignment is handled by a random workload-balancing algorithm, understanding the historical data of your assigned judge is a standard part of case preparation. These aggregate rates describe past decisions rather than predicting your specific outcome.

Lifetime SSA records since 2016
Approval rate 40%
Decisions on record 630

SSA has not published a latest-period approval, fully favorable or denial breakdown for Judge Wheatley. The most recent period with decisions on record is September 29, 2017. Those rows are left out rather than estimated.

Approval rate over time

Year-over-year approval rate across Judge Wheatley's docket. Annual rates fluctuate with the mix of cases SSA assigns; the longer-run pattern is more informative than any single year.

Judge Wheatley
0%20%40%60%80%100%FY16FY17
Source: SSA OHO disposition data. Approval rate (SSA's term: allowance rate) = fully favorable + partially favorable decisions divided by total decisions, which exclude dismissals.

Decision pattern

The record for G. Ross Wheatley spans from 2016 to 2017, covering 630 lifetime decisions. During this window, the approval rate remained consistent, moving from 40% in 2016 to 39% in 2017. This indicates a steady decision pattern throughout the available data. These numbers provide insight into past trends but do not account for the specific medical evidence or vocational factors unique to your case.

Preparing for an SSDI hearing

The guidance below applies to any SSDI hearing, not specifically to Judge Wheatley's bench. Judge-specific preparation guidance requires a corpus of public Appeals Council decisions involving each judge, which we haven't built yet.

  • Bring a clean treating-physician record. Longitudinal primary-care or specialist notes spanning the disability period, with consistent symptom documentation, are typically the strongest evidence at hearing. A single month's records usually aren't enough.
  • Don't rely on consultative exams alone. If your medical evidence is built primarily around a one-time CE finding, expect detailed questioning. Supplement with treating-source statements where possible.
  • Prepare for daily-activity questions. Have honest, specific answers about a typical day. Answers that conflict with the medical record (in either direction) tend to hurt credibility.
  • Expect transferable-skills probing. A vocational expert will usually testify about jobs available to someone with your limitations. Your representative should be prepared to cross-examine.

Hearing scheduled?

Free 2 minutes Confidential

About the Stockton hearing office

The Stockton hearing office serves claimants throughout the region, operating as a key hub for SSDI hearings in California. With 11 judges on record since 2016, the office manages a diverse caseload requiring thorough documentation of medical and vocational evidence. You can expect a formal administrative process focused on the specific requirements of your disability claim. See the Stockton hearing office page for the full ALJ roster.

Other judges at this hearing office

The Stockton hearing office currently has 11 judges on record since 2016, with 4 judges reported in the latest SSA period. SSA assigns cases through a workload-balancing algorithm, meaning the judge you are assigned is essentially random. Approval rates across this bench vary significantly, ranging from 23% to 82% on lifetime records. For preparation purposes, the guidance remains consistent regardless of which judge you are assigned.

Approval rates change with a lawyer

WITHOUT A LAWYER
baseline approval rate
Unrepresented claimants
WITH A LAWYER
~3×
higher approval rate
Represented claimants

Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-18-37. The 3× gap is a population-wide average across all judges; individual outcomes vary.

Frequently asked questions